<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Airport Chronicles &#187; FAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.airportchronicles.com/tag/faa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com</link>
	<description>The latest airport operations information, FAA regulations, and aviation buzz from a Commercial pilot working in Airport Management.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:53:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>FAR Part 77 Objections Affecting Navigable Airspace</title>
		<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com/far-part-77-objections-affecting-navigable-airspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.airportchronicles.com/far-part-77-objections-affecting-navigable-airspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airport Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part 77]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airportchronicles.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAR Part 77 is one of the most important aspects that must be considered when operating an airport. A duty of airport operations is to keep a close eye on what is happening around the field. It is very common to see unauthorized cranes just boom up. They must have an airspace study performed. If [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airportchronicles.com/far-part-77-objections-affecting-navigable-airspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAR Part 139.305 &#8211; Airfield Pavement Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com/airfield-pavement-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.airportchronicles.com/airfield-pavement-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airport Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part 139]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airportchronicles.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post, Part 139 Airport Certification, I explained what defines an airport as Part 139 by the Federal Aviation Administration. This post will elaborate on Section 305 of FAR Part 139, which entails pavement management. The condition of taxiways and runways is of the utmost importance to the safety of passengers.  For [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airportchronicles.com/airfield-pavement-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Airport Zipper Line</title>
		<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com/airport-zipper-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.airportchronicles.com/airport-zipper-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airport Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport Markings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airportchronicles.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pilot recently asked me what the alternating white and black stripes were on the carrier ramp of her airport. I’m sure a lot of people are curious, so I’ll share the answer here. It is called the zipper line and it extends across many carrier and cargo ramps prior to the movement area. It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airportchronicles.com/airport-zipper-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NTSB Finds Glass Cockpits Are Not Safer Than Steam Gauges</title>
		<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com/ntsb-finds-glass-cockpits-not-safer-than-steam-gauges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.airportchronicles.com/ntsb-finds-glass-cockpits-not-safer-than-steam-gauges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass Cockpit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTSB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steam Gauges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airportchronicles.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NTSB came to the conclusion yesterday that glass cockpits are not safer than conventional steam instruments. The study began more than a year ago to determine whether light fixed-wing aircraft equipped with glass cockpits such as the Garmin G1000 and Avidyne PFD4000 were actually safer, but the results found steam instruments have less of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airportchronicles.com/ntsb-finds-glass-cockpits-not-safer-than-steam-gauges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 139 Airport Certification</title>
		<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com/part-139-airport-certification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.airportchronicles.com/part-139-airport-certification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airport Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part 139]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airportchronicles.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After several e-mails from readers inquiring about Part 139 airports, I figured it was time to give Airport Chronicles some much needed attention with a new blog.
Under 14 CFR Part 139, the FAA is required to issue airport operating certificates to airports that:

 Serve scheduled and unscheduled air carrier aircraft with more than 30 seats;
 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airportchronicles.com/part-139-airport-certification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Trouble For Gulfstream International Airlines</title>
		<link>http://www.airportchronicles.com/trouble-gulfstream-international-airlines-gia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.airportchronicles.com/trouble-gulfstream-international-airlines-gia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 05:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beechcraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulfstream International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airportchronicles.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gulfstream International Airlines (GIA) is feeling more heat from the FAA. On three occasions, pilots of the airline allowed a passenger in the cockpit of a Beechcraft 1900, turboprop aircraft, during flight. The first two incidents happened in the same day, with a female friend of the Captain during the summer of 2007. The third [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airportchronicles.com/trouble-gulfstream-international-airlines-gia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->